Case Report: A 31-Year-Old Man with Relapsing Complicated Diverticulitis after Initial Conservative Treatment

Authors

  • Michael B. Iorga Author
  • Stephanie M. Cruz Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1815-6236
  • Avik Karmaker Author
  • Hussein Matari Author
  • Marc K. Wallack Author
  • Daniel Stephens Author
  • Robert Santopietro Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70422/gtpdkq19

Keywords:

Diverticulitis, Diverticulosis, Hartmann’s procedure, laparoscopic lavage and drainage, Hinchey Classification

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the surgical approach for severe complications of diverticular disease. The classical approach has been a Hartmann’s procedure, but laparoscopic lavage and drainage has been suggested as an alternative. We present a patient who initially responded to conservative management of complicated diverticulitis, but had a recurrence that was managed surgically.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old man presented with Hinchey Stage I diverticulitis and was discharged from the hospital after medical management. Six days later, he returned to the hospital with radiographic evidence of a pericolonic abscess. The patient was taken to the operating room for laparoscopic drainage with placement of a drain in the abscess cavity. He required reoperation with sigmoid colon resection, primary anastomosis, and diverting ileostomy.

DISCUSSION: Despite requiring reoperation, the authors believe that initial conservative management possibly prevented progression to generalized feculent peritonitis. If this had occurred, the patient may have required Hartmann’s procedure, which is associated with more complications than primary anastomosis with protective ileostomy.

CONCLUSION: The patient had recurrence of complicated diverticular disease that was initially managed conservatively and then with laparoscopic drainage, followed by primary anastomosis with protective ileostomy. Given individual patient factors, the authors believe that he was managed optimally. There is currently controversy between the use of laparoscopic lavage and drainage versus Hartmann’s procedure for the management of complicated colonic diverticular disease and more investigation is required on the subject.

References

N. Horesh, N. Wasserberg, A. P. Zbar, A. Gravetz, Y. Berger, M. Gutman, D. Rosin, and O. Zmora, “Changing paradigms in the management of diverticulitis,” International journal of surgery (London, England) 33 Pt A, 146–150 (2016).

A. M. Morris, S. E. Regenbogen, K. M. Hardiman, and S. Hendren, “Sigmoid diverticulitis: a systematic review,” Jama 311, 287–297 (2014).

E. J. Hinchey, P. G. Schaal, and G. K. Richards, “Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon,” Advances in Surgery 12, 85–109 (1978).

B. Siewert, G. Tye, J. Kruskal, J. Sosna, F. Opelka, V. Rap- topoulos, and S. N. Goldberg, “Impact of ct-guided drainage in the treatment of diverticular abscesses: size matters,” AJR.American journal of roentgenology 186, 680– 686 (2006).

F. Elagili, L. Stocchi, G. Ozuner, D. W. Dietz, and R. P. Kiran, “Outcomes of percutaneous drainage without surgery for patients with diverticular abscess,” Diseases of the colon and rectum 57, 331–336 (2014).

Z. H. Krukowski and N. A. Matheson, “Emergency surgery for diverticular disease complicated by generalized and faecal peritonitis: A review,” British Journal of Surgery 71, 921–927 (1984).

O. Kronborg, “Treatment of perforated sigmoid divertic- ulitis: A prospective randomized trial,” British Journal of Surgery 80, 505–507 (1993).

D. W. Seah, S. Ibrahim, and K. H. Tay, “Hartmann procedure: is it still relevant today?” ANZ Journal of Surgery 75, 436– 440 (2005).

L. Salem, D. A. Anaya, K. E. Roberts, and D. R. Flum, “Hartmann’s colectomy and reversal in diverticulitis: a population-level assessment,” Diseases of the colon and rectum 48, 988–995 (2005).

E. Myers, M. Hurley, G. C. O’Sullivan, D. Kavanagh, I. Wil- son, and D. C. Winter, “Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis,” British Journal of Surgery 95, 97–101 (2008).

S. Liang, K. Russek, and M. E. F. Jr, “Damage control strategy for the management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis: laparoscopic lavage and drainage vs. laparoscopic hartmann’s procedure,” Surgical endoscopy 26, 2835–2842 (2012).

E. Angenete, A. Thornell, J. Burcharth, H. C. Pommergaard, S. Skullman, T. Bisgaard, P. Jess, Z. Lackberg, P. Matthiessen, J. Heath, J. Rosenberg, and E. Haglind, “Laparoscopic lavage is feasible and safe for the treatment of perforated di- verticulitis with purulent peritonitis: The first results from the randomized controlled trial dilala,” Annals of Surgery 263, 117–122 (2016).

C. Bell, M. Asolati, E. Hamilton, J. Fleming, F. Nwariaku, G. Sarosi, and T. Anthony, “A comparison of complications associated with colostomy reversal versus ileostomy rever- sal,” American Journal of Surgery 190, 717–720 (2005).

Published

2024-09-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Case Report: A 31-Year-Old Man with Relapsing Complicated Diverticulitis after Initial Conservative Treatment. (2024). The Pacific Northwest Journal of Surgery, 1(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.70422/gtpdkq19